Back

CNSigs: An R Package for the Identification of Copy Number Mutational Signatures

Tallman, D.; Striker, S.; Byappanahalli, A. M.; Stockard, S.; Jenison, J.; Collier, K. A.; Blige, E.; Vater, M.; Stover, D. G.

2026-06-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.21.733646 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCopy number aberrations (CNAs) are gains and losses of large genomic segments present across most cancer types and are a hallmark of cancer genomic alterations. However, the processes underlying CNAs and characteristic patterns of CNAs are poorly understood. Bioinformatic advances have identified underlying single nucleotide variant (SNV) mutational signatures resulting from distinct mutational processes, yet development of algorithms able to uncover similar signatures for CNAs remains less advanced. MethodsUsing segmented data files from DNA sequencing, six copy number features are extracted for signature determination: segment size, breakpoints per 10 megabases, copy number oscillation events, average changepoint size, average copy number, and breakpoints per chromosome arm, along with ploidy. Mixed model approaches and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) are utilized to derive CNA signatures across cancer types. The full methodology was packaged in a robust R package, termed CNSigs that is publicly available. ResultsTo verify the reproducibility of the signatures, we derived five signatures from two independent breast cancer datasets (total n>3000), demonstrating high accuracy (average cosine similarity = 0.89). Pan-cancer application of CNSigs in the TCGA dataset resulted in derivation of 13 pan-cancer signatures which were significantly associated with disease-specific survival. Benchmarking CNSigs to two other CNA signature approaches within TCGA demonstrated non-overlapping signatures and favorable compute speed for CNSigs. We evaluated n=24 pairs of tumor and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) acquired at the same time and demonstrated that CNSigs are detectable and reproducible via ctDNA, with significant association of CNSig11 with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer progression-free survival for taxane but not platinum or capecitabine chemotherapy. CNSigs association with immunophenotype was evaluated in low-grade glioma (LGG) and CNSig 3 was found to be highly prognostic for LGG yet complementary to immune features. ConclusionsThe CNSigs R package allows researchers to easily analyze their own samples to derive copy number signatures and evaluate clinical associations. We demonstrate potential application in ctDNA and association with treatment response. The development of this package allows further investigation of underlying processes that may be responsible for these CNA fingerprints.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.9%
2
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.2%
3
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
4
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
10
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
12
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
18
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%