Back

Comparative analysis of Illumina and Ultima-Genomics sequencing for plasma cell-free small RNA profiling in pancreatic cancer

Levon, A.; Volkov, H.; Shlayem, R.; Shomron, N.

2026-06-25 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.21.733585 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasma-derived cell-free small non-coding RNAs are promising non-invasive biomarkers for cancer detection and monitoring. However, variability in sequencing output limits standardization, and cross-platform performance for plasma small RNA profiling has not been systematically evaluated. Illumina short-read sequencing is the current standard, whereas the newcomer, Ultima-Genomics platform, has been less extensively studied for circulating small RNA in plasma. To directly compare platform performance, we sequenced plasma cell-free RNA from 39 patients with pancreatic cancer and 39 matched controls on both platforms. After filtering, Ultima-Genomics retained more mature microRNA reads, whereas Illumina achieved slightly higher enrichment efficiency and mapping rates. Despite these technical differences, both platforms produced concordant expression profiles, with strong cross-platform correlations for shared microRNAs and clear separation of cases and controls within each dataset. Differential expression analysis identified 14 significant microRNAs on both platforms with concordant directions of change, most of which are supported by pancreatic cancer databases. Pathway enrichment analysis highlighted signaling pathways implicated in pancreatic cancer, supporting the biological relevance of both shared and platform-specific signatures. These findings indicate that both Illumina and Ultima Genomics platforms are suitable for plasma small RNA profiling and capture biologically relevant signals in pancreatic cancer.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.9%
2
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
5
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
11
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
12
Molecular Cancer
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
17
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
21
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
24
Molecular Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%