Back

Smolt migration in relation to latitude, season and migratory distance

Berry, M.; Austad, B.; Aarestrup, K.; Davidsen, J. G.; Nevoux, M.; Alexandre, C. M.; Silva, S. S.; Stevens, J. R.; King, R. A.; Thorstad, E. B.; Höjesjö, J.

2026-06-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.20.733518 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Downstream migration and sea entry are periods of high mortality for sea trout smolts and migration timing is a critical aspect of survival. We aimed to investigate migration timing of PIT-tagged sea trout smolts across a latitudinal gradient in five freshwater systems across Europe: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, France and Portugal. In two systems, smolt migration was further examined to assess a) differences in sex, body size and condition between autumn and spring migrants; b) the influence of spatial origin within the stream; and c) relationships between individual body size and migration date. Tagged smolts were not detected migrating in the Portuguese watershed. Spring migration timing differed significantly between watersheds in Norway, Sweden, Denmark and France. Generally, there was a trend of earlier migration at lower latitudes. Autumn vs spring migration was examined in Gudso-Denmark. Autumn migrants were larger in both length and mass, with no differences in sex ratios or body condition. Fish originating from an upstream site were more likely to migrate in the autumn compared to the spring and vice versa. Size dependent migration was found in the Swedish system, Haga [a]-Sweden, with larger individuals migrating earlier in the spring than smaller individuals. Outward-migrating smolts were also more likely to originate from a downstream site than an upstream site. Overall, these results show both large-scale geographic and fine-scale individual influences on migration timing. Given that climate change may have large impacts on migration patterns in sea trout, understanding variability in migratory patterns across a latitudinal gradient is an important tool for predicting responses to environmental changes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
34.6%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
3
Journal of Fish Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
5
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
17
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Freshwater Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%