InVitroGap: an open-source tool for automated quantification of wound closure in the in vitro scratch assay
ARYA, R. K.; Sindhani, M.; Dewala, S. R.; Weight, C. J.; Bukavina, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundScratch assays are widely used to study wound closure in vitro, but quantitative image analysis remains constrained by manual variability, proprietary workflows, and tools requiring programming expertise. We developed InVitroGap, a Python-based application with a browser-accessible interface for automated quantification of scratch assay closure from sequential microscopy images. MethodsRCC-ER and Renca cells were seeded in 96-well ImageLock plates and scratched using a WoundMaker device for uniform linear wounds or a 200 {micro}L pipette tip for crisscross wounds. Phase-contrast time-lapse images acquired at 0, 24, and 48 h with an IncuCyte SX5 system were independently analyzed using IncuCyte 2023A Rev2 and InVitroGap. The InVitroGap pipeline combines Gaussian smoothing, gradient-based texture mapping, adaptive percentile thresholding, and morphological post-processing to quantify wound confluence and relative wound density (RWD). Agreement was evaluated using paired comparisons, Pearson and Spearman correlations, Bland-Altman analysis, and mean absolute error (MAE). ResultsInVitroGap measurements closely tracked IncuCyte outputs across both cell lines, with no significant between-method differences (p > 0.05), strong pooled correlations (R{superscript 2} = 0.964 for RWD; R{superscript 2} = 0.983 for wound confluence), and small mean biases (absolute bias [≤] 1.64%). The tool successfully processed crisscross wounds from brightfield image series, and a complete four-timepoint series was analyzed in approximately 10 seconds, with robust performance across distinct cell morphologies and wound geometries. ConclusionsInVitroGap provides a transparent, computationally efficient, and platform-independent alternative for scratch assay analysis, delivering performance comparable to commercial systems while remaining freely accessible at https://invitrogap.vercel.app/. HighlightsO_LIOpen-source Python tool for automated, platform-independent in vitro scratch assay analysis C_LIO_LITexture-based adaptive pipelines enable robust wound segmentation across cell types C_LIO_LIQuantifies wound confluence and relative wound density from time-lapse images C_LIO_LIStrong agreement with IncuCyte measurements in the tested datasets C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.