Back

Acoustic detection of a rarely vocalising invasive mammal from sparse data

Gibbons, A.; Parnell, A.; Donohue, I.; Ogasawara, M.; Ross, S. R. P.-J.

2026-06-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.19.733324 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIMonitoring and limiting the spread of invasive species on islands requires efficient detection and population estimation methods. However, elusive species can be difficult to monitor using traditional methods, making autonomous approaches such as camera trapping and acoustic monitoring increasingly valuable. C_LIO_LIOn the island of Okinawa, Japan, the small Indian mongoose ( Urva auropunctata) threatens many native species since its introduction in 1910. Listed among the worlds worst invasive species, effective monitoring of U. auropunctata in Okinawa is critical. The Okinawa Environmental Observation Network (OKEON) uses camera traps to detect U. auropunctata, but success depends on precise placement. Though OKEON also includes a high-resolution acoustic monitoring programme, no audio classification model currently exists for U. auropunctata. Developing such a model could improve substantially our capacity to detect and manage the species. C_LIO_LIUsing sparse U. auropunctata vocalisations collected from camera trap videos, we built a lightweight Convolutional Neural Network distilled from a more complex model for classifying contact calls and alarm calls of U. auropunctata. Our distilled model performed similarly to the full model at detecting vocalisations from training data, but was considerably faster. C_LIO_LIWe applied the distilled classifier to [~]486 hrs of audio collected over eight years from southern Okinawa, where we successfully detected U. auropunctata a handful of times in each year of recording. In spite of strong model performance on test data, our model did not transfer well to unseen data, perhaps owing to the rarity of U. auropunctata calls and consequent small training dataset size, limiting its utility for ecological monitoring. C_LIO_LIPractical implication. The use of sparse audio data from camera trap videos to train an acoustic classifier had limited utility to detect the rarely vocalising U. auropunctata from passive acoustic monitoring data. We provide several recommendations for enhancing classifier performance to provide robust actionable insights into the distribution and spread of U. auropunctata, and aid targeted conservation efforts for Okinawas threatened biodiversity. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
4
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
5
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
11
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
12
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
13
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
19
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
22
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
25
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
27
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%