Back

Clinical-grade Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring via Deep-tissue Diffuse Speckle Pulsatile Flowmetry

Choo, T. W. J.; Yap, A. A. M.; Kawaja, A.; Chao, V. T. T.; Ng, C. J.; Olivo, M.; Bi, R.

2026-06-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.19.26356074 medRxiv
Show abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is a vital sign which is measured to diagnose and manage hypertension. However, current methods to measure BP use inflatable cuffs which cause discomfort and limit the frequency at which measurements can be made, or intra-arterial catheters which are invasive and pose infection risks. Here, we propose and evaluate the use of Diffuse Speckle Pulsatile Flowmetry (DSPF) as a cuffless BP measurement method to address these limitations. DSPF is a laser speckle-based technique which simultaneously records blood flow rate and blood volume (i.e. photoplethysmography or PPG) signals from relatively deep vascular tissue. Using information from these signals, we studied DSPFs effectiveness in measuring systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) through an outpatient study in which 133 patients were recruited, and in measuring beat-to-beat BP waveforms through an inpatient study in which two patients were recruited. In the outpatient study, the DSPF method was able to achieve mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 4.17 mmHg and 2.42 mmHg for SBP and DBP respectively compared to conventional cuff-based methods. It was also able to fulfil the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO 81060-2:2018 standard for BP measurement devices and attain an "A" grade according to the British Hypertension Society grading scheme. For the inpatient study, it produced BP waveforms which had MAEs of 2.35 mmHg and 3.06 mmHg compared to arterial-line measurements for the two patients, respectively. Compared to PPG which has been studied more extensively as a cuffless BP measurement method, we found through ablation studies that DSPF was able to reach significantly lower MAEs and hence better accuracies. DSPF augments the performance of PPG-only methods by leveraging additional information from the blood flow rate signal, and we therefore find it to be a superior cuffless BP measurement method which can potentially be used in outpatient, inpatient, and remote settings.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.0%
3
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
5
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
16
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%