Back

Modular in vitro evaluation of Buparlisib-polymeric nanomedicines in 2D and 3D models of glioblastoma

Havelkova, J.; Petrenko, Y.; Stehlikova, A.; Marekova, D.; Peskova, K.; Pechar, M.; Studenovsky, M.; Etrych, T.; Pola, R.; Jendelova, P.

2026-06-23 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.06.18.732941 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionIn this study, we developed a modular in vitro platform that integrates advanced polymer-drug conjugation chemistry with stepwise cytotoxicity screening in both 2D (monolayer) and 3D (spheroids) glioblastoma (GBM) models. Buparlisib was selected as the model therapeutic due to its well-characterised mechanism of action, high blood-brain barrier permeability, and relevance to PI3K-targeted therapy. MethodsTwo mechanistically distinct conjugation strategies were explored using N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide-based copolymers. The first strategy was based on a redox-sensitive disulphide linkage designed for intracellular glutathione-triggered release, whereas the second used an azide-bearing derivative compatible with strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Drug release was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Biological activity was systematically evaluated in U87MG, U118MG, and T98G cells under 2D conditions using a resazurin-based metabolic activity assay. Subsequently, the more promising disulphide-based formulations were assessed in 3D spheroids by metabolic activity measurements and live-cell monitoring of spheroid growth dynamics. ResultsFree Buparlisib showed the strongest inhibitory effect, while its modification and polymer conjugation reduced the apparent activity. Nevertheless, the disulphide-based derivative and polymer conjugate retained concentration-dependent activity, whereas the azide-based polymer conjugate showed minimal effects. Moreover, treatment responses differed between cell lines and between 2D and 3D models. DiscussionOverall, linker chemistry, cell-line-specific behaviour, and model dimensionality strongly influenced the biological performance of the polymeric Buparlisib formulations. The redox-sensitive polymer conjugate therefore represents the more promising strategy for further development.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.8%
3
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Advanced Therapeutics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
6
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
8
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
10
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Bioconjugate Chemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
13
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
15
ChemMedChem
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Journal of Extracellular Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Lab Animal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
29
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
30
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%