Back

Treadmill training with rhythmic auditory cueing and/or visual feedback for persons with Multiple Sclerosis: feasibility and effects on gait parameters in a clinical randomized controlled trial

Kröber, P.; Wolf, F.; Saliger, J.; Nielsen, J.; Eschweiler, M.

2026-06-22 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.06.18.26356023 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Gait training incorporating visual feedback or rhythmic auditory cueing has shown promising results in neurological conditions but has rarely been investigated in clinical rehabilitation for persons with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Objective To evaluate the feasibility of treadmill training (TT) with visual feedback (VF) and TT with visual feedback plus rhythmic auditory cueing (VF+RAC) during clinical rehabilitation and explore its effects on gait parameters. Methods PwMS were randomly allocated 1:1 to perform ten 30-minute training sessions of TT with VF or VF+RAC during inpatient rehabilitation. The primary outcome was feasibility (adherence, compliance, safety, and acceptability). Secondary outcomes were session-by-session developments in spatiotemporal and qualitative gait parameters. Results Sixty of 68 randomized participants completed the intervention (VF: n=29; VF+RAC: n=31). Adherence and compliance rates were 93% and 86%, respectively, with no differences between groups. The most common adverse event in both groups was (leg) pain (21/38 total adverse events). One fall occurred in 629 sessions. Both interventions were greatly accepted and perceived as fun, motivating and helpful to achieve rehabilitation goals. Both groups increased in distance, gait speed, and average step length. Step length variability did not change in the VF-group, while the VF+RAC-group slightly improved. Step length difference was constantly low in the VF+RAC-group, while the VF-group differences were elevated. Conclusions VF and VF+RAC are feasible training options for pwMS in a rehabilitation setting and are greatly accepted by participants. Qualitative gait parameters should be investigated in studies powered to detect clinically relevant differences in the future.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.8%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.6%
3
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
6
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
8
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
12
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
16
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
22
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%