Genetic and maternal environmental contributions to estimated fetal weight at 20 weeks gestation compared with birthweight
Purdy, R. A.; Feng, J.; Luo, Z.; Beaumont, R. N.; Hattersley, A. T.; He, J.; Qiu, X.; Freathy, R. M.; Hughes, A. E.
Show abstract
Abstract Introduction: Birthweight reflects fetal growth from conception. The complications arising from the extremes of fetal growth are well known, but addressing these effectively depends on understanding how and when fetal growth is affected by various maternal and fetal factors. We aimed to compare associations of fetal genetic and maternal environmental factors with fetal weight mid-pregnancy and birthweight. Material and methods: We studied 3110 mother-child pairs from three population-based birth cohorts (UK and China). Estimated fetal weight at ~20 weeks gestation (EFW20) and birthweight were the outcomes of interest. Exposures were fetal genetic factors (fetal sex and fetal birthweight genetic score [BW GS]) and maternal factors (maternal BW GS, BMI, fasting plasma glucose [FPG], smoking, age, and parity). Associations were studied using multivariable linear regressions within cohorts and meta-analysed. Results: All exposures were associated with both EFW20 and birthweight, apart from maternal FPG and smoking which were associated with birthweight only. Male fetal sex and a higher maternal BW GS were consistently associated with higher EFW20 and birthweight, whereas the fetal BW GS, maternal FPG, BMI and smoking showed more marked associations later in pregnancy. Maternal age and parity showed directionally opposite associations with EFW20 and birthweight. Conclusions: Fetal genetic and maternal environmental factors vary in their effect on fetal growth in mid-pregnancy compared with late pregnancy. These findings contribute to our understanding of growth across pregnancy and may inform the timing of clinical monitoring of fetal growth and interventions targeting modifiable maternal factors.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Smoking during pregnancy and its effect on placental weight: A Mendelian randomization study 96%
- Social inequalities in pregnancy metabolic profile: findings from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort study 95%
- Reduction in Spontaneous and Iatrogenic Preterm Births in Twin Pregnancies During COVID-19 Lockdown in Melbourne, Australia: A Multicenter Cohort Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association study meta-analysis supports association between MUC1 and ectopic pregnancy 94%
- Body mass index and subfertility: multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization analyses in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study 94%
- Impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in relation to infertility: a Mendelian randomization analysis in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal obesity before pregnancy predicts offspring blood pressure at 18 years of age: A causal mediation analysis 96%
- Maternal obesity, interpregnancy weight changes and congenital heart defects in the offspring 92%
- Body mass index changes and their association with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a real-world analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Offspring cardiometabolic outcomes and postnatal growth trajectories after exposure to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- Polygenic risk of obesity and BMI trajectories over 36 years: a longitudinal study of adult Finnish twins 92%
- The Pediatric Obesity Microbiome and Metabolism Study (POMMS): Methods, Baseline Data, and Early Insights. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 96%
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: A wide-angled Mendelian randomization study 94%
- The effect of maternal BMI, smoking and alcohol on congenital heart diseases: a Mendelian randomization study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.