Back

Use of the Pharmacy First service in England in the first 12 months: geographic variation and health system context

Meng, W.; Sonnex, K.; Pehlivanli, A.; Allen, T.; Dolan, E.; Glover, R.; Goulding, J.; Higgins, H.; Mays, N.; Taylor, A.; Thornley, T.; Avery, A. J.

2026-06-22 health policy
10.64898/2026.06.18.26355952 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: The Pharmacy First (PF) service was introduced across England from 31 January 2024 to expand the clinical role of community pharmacies and improve access to primary care. This paper describes use of PF in its first 12 months, in terms of uptake, access routes, consultation outcomes, geographic variations, service costs and antimicrobial supply. Methods: A descriptive analysis of all PF consultations submitted for payment to NHS Business Services Authority in England between 31 January 2024 and 31 January 2025. Pharmacy-level consultation data were linked to national data on population, location and pharmacy characteristics. PF use was examined using population-standardised consultation rates and consultations per pharmacy. Results: During the first year of implementation, 2,205,731 PF consultations were recorded as delivered across 11,349 pharmacies, with payment of GBP123 million to pharmacies. Uptake increased steadily over time. Most consultations were for acute sore throat (33%) and uncomplicated urinary tract infection (27%), with corresponding antibiotics, phenoxymethylpenicillin and nitrofurantoin being the most supplied. Most people self-referred (74%) into the service, with 95% of consultations managed without onward referral. Substantial geographic variation was observed. Northern regions had higher use based on the eligible population. The South East and Midlands had higher activity per pharmacy. London showed a distinct pattern, with higher self-referral into the service, lower medication supply and higher referral to other healthcare services. Higher consultation volume was weakly associated with pharmacy characteristics, including opening hours, pharmacy type and retail setting, and local context, in terms of socio-economic and geographic factors. Conclusions: PF had immediate uptake and is operating primarily as a direct-access model for common acute conditions. Findings suggest that PF is contributing to improved access to care and may shift demand away from general practice. However, the service uptake appears to be shaped by geographic location, proximity to other healthcare services and pharmacy characteristics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.8%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
9
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
11
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
14
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
19
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
20
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%