Back

Dynamic balance of sparse flux vectors for efficient simulation of culture dynamics and metabolic network reduction

Tapia García, I.; Torrealba, C.; Luna, R.; Pérez-Correa, J. R.; Saa, P. A.

2026-06-22 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.17.733012 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis (DFBA) enables simulation of microbial culture dynamics under changing environmental conditions, but remains computationally expensive for tasks such as parameter calibration and fermentation optimization when applied using genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs). To address this challenge, we introduce Dynamic Flux Vector Balancing (DFVB), a reformulation of DFBA that solves an equivalent problem using a pre-computed, sparse basis of flux solutions that reduces the dimensionality of the internal optimization problem without information loss. Notably, DFVB provides a compact, interpretable representation of flux states that can readily identify dynamically inactive pathways and enable simulation-based automatic metabolic network reduction. We showed that DFVB produces the same culture dynamics as DFBA across multiple model scales and conditions, and identifies inactive reactions more accurately than Flux Variability Analysis (FVA) when compared to transcriptomic data profiles. Furthermore, computational performance analyses demonstrated that integrating DFVB with solver warm-start strategies and model reduction enhances computational efficiency relative to DFBA, yielding up to 3-fold reductions in simulation time for large-scale metabolic models. Finally, kinetic parameter estimation of culture dynamics with DFVB in two fermentation scenarios using a large-scale yeast GEM reached equal or higher prediction fidelity and narrower confidence intervals than DFBA, indicating improved parameter identifiability and robustness. Together, these results position DFVB as a scalable, robust, and biologically coherent framework for dynamic metabolic modeling, easing the integration of GEMs for culture dynamics simulation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
2
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.5%
3
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
7.9%
5
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
18
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
21
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
23
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%
26
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%