Back

When Less Is Not More: DICEPro Mitigates the Impact of Incomplete Reference Matrices on Cellular Frequency Deconvolution.

BA, K.; Thiebaut, R.; Hinaut, X.; Hejblum, B. P.

2026-06-22 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.17.732876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cellular deconvolution aims to estimate the frequencies of different cell populations from gene expression measurements in a biological sample. Supervised approaches, such as CIBERSORTx and DISSECT, critically depend on the reference signature matrix, which encodes the gene expression profiles of cell-types based on prior knowledge. Despite numerous deconvolution methods, the impact of missing cell populations in the reference matrix remains understudied. Here, we evaluate the robustness of state-of-the-art deconvolution approaches using simulations based on real dataset examples combined with statistical modeling, validated against published data, and multiple real benchmark datasets. Results show that deconvolution performance remains stable when the reference matrix includes most cell-types, but declines sharply as the matrix becomes incomplete, especially for abundant cell populations. To address the limitations of incomplete reference matrices, we introduce DICEPro, an optimization-based framework designed to enhance existing deconvolution methods. By systematically adjusting the reference signatures, DICEPro better accounts for missing or underrepresented cell populations, leading to improved precision and robustness. We show that DICEPro consistently boosts deconvolution performance across both simulated datasets, derived from real data examples, and multiple real biological datasets, offering a practical solution when standard methods are hindered by incomplete references.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
22.5%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.7%
3
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.0%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
7.9%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.6%
7
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
8
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.5%
14
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
17
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
The Annals of Applied Statistics
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
21
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%