Back

Evaluation of analysis modes for RNA coexpression in single-cell and bulk tissue

Pavlidis, P.; Chu, P.; Elazzabi, N.; Garreau, J.; Xu, B.; Xiang Yu, X.; Morin, A.

2026-06-19 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.17.731965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coexpression of transcripts presents the most common means of computational inference of transcription factor regulation, and is often combined with other data types to infer regulatory networks. With the growing popularity of single-cell approaches, there are questions about how best to extract coexpression information from the data. Recently we reported a simulation study that explored the differences among coexpression performed at different levels: across single cells (xCell, per cell type), across subjects from pseudobulked single-cell data (xSubject, per cell type), or across subjects using bulk tissue samples (xBulk). Here we test predictions made by those models using real data. We consider both preservation (consistency of coexpression findings across different levels of analysis of the same data) and replicability across independent studies, as well as biological interpretability. We find that preservation across levels is limited, indicating the choice of analysis level will affect outcomes. We show that xCell coexpression is more replicable across studies compared to xSubject. xBulk coexpression is dominated by patterns driven by variability in cellular composition and fails to capture much coexpression that is reliably detected at finer resolutions. While all modes of analysis exhibit some enrichment for known regulatory relationships, it was highest with the xCell mode. Finally, we present a case study of the effect of analysis modes on a schizophrenia-associated pattern, reinforcing the importance of analytic choices in the interpretation and replicability of coexpression analyses. Together with our modeling study, this work emphasizes the importance of understanding sources of expression covariation as they relate to the goals of the analysis, and recommend single-cell-based data with biological replicates should be the focus of attempts to infer dynamic regulatory interactions that are more likely to be replicable by others.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.4%
4
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
8
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
15
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
22
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
26
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
28
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%