Back

Virtual Responsive Neurostimulation Implantation: From Intracranial Connectivity to Optimized Lead Placement

Feys, O.; Walsh, K. G.; Nix, K. C.; Josyula, M.; Sinha, N.; Lavelle, S. B.; Wagenaar, J.; Michalak, A.; Morrell, M. J.; Jeschke, J.; Khambhati, A. N.; Conrad, E. C.; Kleen, J. K.; Litt, B.; Rao, V. R.; Friedman, D.; Davis, K. A.

2026-06-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.17.26355892 medRxiv
Show abstract

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is an implanted device that delivers direct brain stimulation for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Individual responses are highly variable, and no validated framework exists to predict outcome or guide lead placement before implantation. We hypothesized that this variability is partly explained by lead placement in relation to patterns of functional connectivity in brain networks. Fourty-nine patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent pre-implantation intracranial EEG (iEEG) and RNS implantation across three independent epilepsy centers were retrospectively studied. We developed a composite functional connectivity score, based on simple Spearman correlation, combining the standard deviation and kurtosis of interictal iEEG connectivity distributions to predict the response outcome in a training cohort (HUP, n=18) and validated in two independent cohorts (NYU, n=17; UCSF, n=14). We accounted for a spatial mismatch between iEEG and RNS electrodes with a distance-based correction. The score was extended to generate patient-specific 3D maps of predicted RNS efficacy across 200 simulated, or virtual RNS, lead configurations. Accuracy of the score in predicting clinical outcome was 72% at the group level, 61% at the individual patient level, and, after distance-based optimization, 100% in patients with RNS electrodes placed close to location of iEEG electrodes. Applied to the validation cohort, the same score reached 68% accuracy (71% balanced accuracy, 55% sensitivity, 88% specificity). The spatial combination of the scores at different SEEG contacts localization gives a spatial score for each patient. Responders showed significantly higher spatial scores than non-responders, supporting that actual RNS lead placement in responders was located in map-identified favorable regions. Interictal iEEG functional connectivity predicts individual RNS response across independent epilepsy centers, and patient-specific 3D maps derived from this biomarker could prospectively guide lead implantation toward favorable network regions, opening a promising avenue toward network-informed RNS surgical planning.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.8%
3
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
4
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
6
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
9
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.1%
12
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
14
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
25
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%