Back

An in vitro regeneration system with efficient rooting in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) supports recovery of transgenic plants

Datta, J.; Bhowmik, S. D.; Williams, B.; Kerr, S. C.

2026-07-08 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732047 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In vitro regeneration of Citrus plants is a widely used method, however, induction of adventitious roots from regenerated shoots remains a major bottleneck, limiting the recovery of healthy plants for commercial production and genomic research for crop improvement. We established an in vitro regeneration system producing profuse, healthy roots for sweet orange (Citrus sinensis cv. Benyenda) by optimising combinations and concentrations of auxins. Prior to optimising the rooting media (RTMs), we obtained a shoot regeneration rate of 90.6% from sweet orange epicotyl explants using a cytokinin, 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP). Across twelve auxin-supplemented RTMs containing different concentrations of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and/or 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), rooting percentages ranged from 8 - 87.5%. The combination of IBA 1.0 mg L-1 and NAA 0.1 mg L-1 promoted the best overall performance, 75 {+/-} 7.2% rooting percentage with healthy, callus-free roots ([≥]5 cm in length), whereas other RTMs with other auxin combinations induced callus and limited root elongation. The best-performing SRM and RTM were subsequently used for selection and recovery of transgenic sweet orange lines carrying an empty CRISPR/Cas9 construct, resulting in an 4.8% transformation efficiency. Both transgenic and non-transgenic rooted plantlets were successfully acclimatised under glasshouse conditions with a survival rate of 90%. This enhanced regeneration system overcomes rooting bottleneck and improves plant survival,enabling faster recovery of transgenic citrus lines within four months. It supports accelerated development for commercial applications and advances in citrus genetic improvement.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
4
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
8
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
10
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
20
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Plant Cell Reports
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%