A Novel Correction Method for QT Interval in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block Morphology
Alasti, M.; Esmailian, A.; Machado, C.; Adhikari, J.; Cheng, S. H.; Ha, F.; Alison, J.; Krahn, A. D.; Han, H.-C.
Show abstract
Background Accurate assessment of the QT interval is challenging in the presence of QRS prolongation, such as during ventricular pacing or bundle branch block. Current correction methods are heterogeneous and lack consensus. To evaluate the relationship between QRS duration and QT interval during ventricular pacing and to develop a practical correction method for QT assessment. Methods In this prospective single-centre study, 94 patients undergoing electrophysiology study for supraventricular tachycardia were included. Standardised pacing was performed at the same cycle length from the right ventricular (RV) apex, high output and low output pacing from His catheter, and coronary sinus (reference). QRS and QT intervals were measured from 12-lead ECGs. Changes in QT (QT) and QRS duration (QRS) were analysed using linear regression and mixed-effects modelling. QT correction formulas of the form QT corrected = QT N x QRS were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis across multiple coefficients. Results A significant positive correlation between QRS and QT was observed across all pacing sites (r = 0.52-0.74, p < 0.001). In mixed-effects modelling, QRS was a strong independent predictor of QT (0.59, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction between pacing site and QRS, supporting a consistent relationship across pacing locations. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that correction coefficients of 0.65-0.70 minimised systematic bias compared with lower coefficients, with similar precision across models (SD 16 ms) and no evidence of proportional bias. A coefficient of 0.65 provided the most balanced performance between bias and variability. Conclusion QT prolongation during ventricular pacing is primarily driven by QRS widening and follows a consistent linear relationship across pacing sites. A simple correction using QT corrected = QT 0.65 x (QRS 100 ms) provides a practical and accurate method for QT assessment, with potential clinical applicability in patients with conduction abnormalities or ventricular pacing.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Atrial functional substrates for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation 96%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 94%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Surgical strategy for atrial functional mitral regurgitation with atrial fibrillation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- T vector velocity: A new ECG biomarker for identifying drug effects on cardiac ventricular repolarization 95%
- High-resolution Spatiotemporal Changes in Dominant Frequency and Structural Organization During Persistent Atrial Fibrillation 94%
- Ventricular anatomical complexity and gender differences impact predictions from computational models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of electrophysiological left bundle branch pacing characteristics in different bilateral electrode pacing vector configurations 96%
- Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Troponin Elevation in COVID-19 94%
- Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.