Back

Hospital staff views on the visibility, role and impact of Acute Learning Disability Liaison Services in Wales: a service evaluation

Sha'aban, A.; Mazzaschi, F. I. M.; Alazizi, A.; McAulay, M.; Edwards, A.; Joseph-Williams, N. I. M.

2026-06-18 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.16.26355793 medRxiv
Show abstract

People with a learning disability experience marked health inequalities. In Wales, Acute Learning Disability Liaison Services (ALDLS) are delivered by specialised learning disability services, and all roles within them are undertaken by Learning Disability Liaison Nurses (LDLN). These services aim to enable access to, and delivery of, secondary care by supporting reasonable adjustments, facilitating communication, and coordinating care for people with learning disability during hospital encounters. However, independent evidence of the impact of ALDLS on patient care remains limited. This evaluation tries to address this evidence gap by examining hospital staff perceptions of the visibility, role, and impact of ALDLS across Welsh Health Boards, with the aim of informing service design and development and improving secondary care access and care for people with learning disability. The service evaluation used a qualitative approach involving interviews and a focus group with hospital staff across the seven Welsh Health Boards who had experience working with or interacting with ALDLS staff to care for patients with learning disability. Findings cover six key areas including i) visibility and delivery of ALDLS, ii) Barriers and challenges to effective ALDLS delivery, iii) Enablers of effective ALDLS delivery, iv) Positive impacts for patients with learning disability, v) Negative impacts and unintended consequences when the service is absent or limited, and vi) Participants recommendations for future improvements of ALDLS. To synthesise the findings, we developed an overview diagram, which illustrates how ALDLS may influence care quality in acute hospitals. The overview places the liaison service at the centre, showing how organisational enablers and barriers shape its delivery, and how its core functions support improvements in safety, timeliness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and patient-centred care. From the findings we have identified recommendations for practice and policy. These include that ALDLS should be recognised as a core, safety-critical component of acute hospital care for people with a learning disability, rather than an optional add-on. In practice, services should be more visibly embedded within routine pathways, with consistent site-based presence, clear referral criteria, early identification through electronic flagging and notification systems, and routine involvement in multidisciplinary planning for complex admissions and procedures. At policy level, ALDLS provision should be recognised within equality and patient safety frameworks as an essential service requiring sustained investment, national minimum configuration standards, adequate staffing, and better-integrated digital systems to support continuity, equitable access, and person-centred care.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.5%
2
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
11.0%
4
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Emergency Medicine Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
12
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
14
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Palliative Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%