Deep learning for interactive and automated inner retinal layer segmentation in OCT images of patients with retinitis pigmentosa using limited training data
Laurence, D. S.; Schilling, M.; Grimm, N.-A.; Mace, E.; Bemme, S.; Pape, C.
Show abstract
Purpose: New therapeutic strategies such as optogenetics have created a need for accurate tracking of inner retina degeneration in Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients. We introduce two tailored deep learning models to segment the RNFL (retinal nerve fibre layer), GCIPL (ganglion cell inner plexiform layer), INL (inner nuclear layer), CFT (central foveal thickness) and RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) in RP: The first is based on a Segment Anything Model (SAM), the second on nnU-Net. To our knowledge, SAM has not yet been applied to retinal layers in OCT data. Methods: SD-OCT images of a retrospective cohort of 37 RP patients were included. Data for four training cycles were prepared semi-automatically in MATLAB, then assessed and corrected by three expert graders. 1,700 segmented B-Scans from two open datasets were used for pretraining. For post-processing, semantic retinal boundary detection was developed. The final models, OCT-SAM and nnU-Net, were trained on 228 annotated RP scans. Detected layer thicknesses were validated against manual segmentation at 90 random points in 30 OCT B-Scans. Finally, OCT-SAM was tested on three RP cases with retrospective, longitudinal OCT data. Results: nnU-Net achieved a precision, recall and F-1 score of 0.96 while OCT-SAM performance resulted in slightly lower values of 0.93, 0.8 and 0.85, respectively. OCT-SAM measurements had low bias and good agreement with manual annotations, confirming reliability. Conclusions: OCT-SAM enabled fast data annotation and tool integration, whereas nnU-Net provided the best segmentation performance. OCT-SAM demonstrated longitudinal reproducibility and detected RP-characteristic pathologies and degenerative changes. Future work will extend OCT-SAM to 3D OCT segmentation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Autonomous screening for Diabetic Macular Edema using deep learning processing of retinal images 96%
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of More Than 3500 Inherited Retinal Disease Patients from the United Kingdom 96%
- Artificial intelligence to facilitate clinical trial recruitment in age-related macular degeneration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability of retinal pathology quantification in age-related macular degeneration: Implications for clinical trials and machine learning applications 96%
- AutoMorph: Automated Retinal Vascular Morphology Quantification via a Deep Learning Pipeline 96%
- Current applications of artificial intelligence for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a systematic review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circular functional analysis of OCT data for precise identification of structural phenotypes in the eye 96%
- Modeling rod and cone photoreceptor cell survival in vivo using optical coherence tomography 96%
- Detecting Glaucoma Worsening Using Optical Coherence Tomography Derived Visual Field Estimates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of OCT biomarker changes in treatment-naive neovascular AMD using a deep semantic segmentation algorithm 98%
- Dense Optic Nerve Head Deformation Estimated using CNN as a Structural Biomarker of Glaucoma Progression 96%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.