Back

Vessel Spatial Analysis (VeSpA): a tool for whole slide image segmentation, morphometry, and QuPath extension.

Grion, G.; Hussain, R.; Colella, F. E.; Roufail, K.; Uccella, S.; Frapolli, R.; Matteo, C.; Mintemur, O.; Pennati, F.; Renne, S. L.

2026-06-20 pathology
10.64898/2026.06.15.732366 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying vascular architecture in histological whole slide images is needed to study tissue organisation, tumour microenvironment biology, and diseaseassociated vascular remodelling. However, vessel analysis in routine immunohistochemistry remains challenging. Available workflows are often manual, require programming expertise, or lack direct integration with digital pathology platforms. We developed VeSpA (Vessel Spatial Analysis), an open-source pipeline and QuPath extension for automated vessel segmentation and morphometric quantification in CD31-stained whole slide images. VeSpA combines configurable signal extraction, using CMYK Yellow channel extraction by default and optional DAB stain deconvolution for H-DAB images, with automatic or percentile-based thresholding, morphological refinement, contour filtering, and lumen filling to generate vessel masks from standard DAB-stained sections. The QuPath extension includes a graphical interface for selecting annotations, TMA cores, or whole images, configuring segmentation parameters, running the Python backend, and importing vessel objects directly into the QuPath hierarchy. For each detected vessel, VeSpA extracts area, major axis length, minor axis length, eccentricity, centroid, and orientation, while also appending summary measurements to parent annotations and TMA cores. Validation against independent pathologist annotations showed that VeSpA achieved segmentation performance close to inter-rater agreement and outperformed yellow channel prompt-based SAM and zero-shot YOLOv8-seg on overlap-based metrics in the tested dataset. VeSpA integrates vessel segmentation, morphometric feature extraction, and QuPath-based visualisation into a single reproducible workflow for vascular quantification in computational pathology and spatial analysis of histological tissue architecture.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
7.9%
3
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
6
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
8
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
13
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
23
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
Skeletal Muscle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
30
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%