Back

Endosymbiont Wolbachia infection prevalence in biting midges of the family Ceratopogonidae in Southwest Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Moemenbellah-Fard, M. D.; Abbasi, E.

2026-06-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.15.732281 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo estimate the pooled prevalence of Wolbachia infection in biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) across Southwest Asia and to evaluate ecological and biological factors associated with infection patterns. Study DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. MethodsA comprehensive search of international and regional databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, SID, MagIran) was conducted without date restriction. Eligible studies included those using molecular techniques to detect Wolbachia in Ceratopogonidae collected from Southwest Asia. Pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to assess variations by country, species, altitude, habitat type, and sex. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using I{superscript 2}, Cochrans Q, and Eggers tests in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. ResultsTwenty-four studies comprising 14,832 midges from six countries were included. The pooled prevalence of Wolbachia infection was 32.6% (95% CI: 28.4-36.9%; I{superscript 2}=78.3%). Iran showed the highest prevalence (38.2%), and Culicoides imicola was the most frequently infected species (36.8%). Higher prevalence was associated with lower altitudes (<500 m; P=0.012), rural habitats (P=0.034), and female midges (P=0.008). Limited evidence suggested the presence of cytoplasmic incompatibility and reduced bluetongue virus competence in infected midges. ConclusionsWolbachia infection is common among Ceratopogonidae in Southwest Asia and is influenced by ecological and biological factors. These findings highlight the potential of Wolbachia as a biocontrol tool in regional vector management, underscoring the need for further experimental and strain-level studies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
3
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
6
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Parasitology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Journal of Medical Entomology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Pathogens
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
23
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
25
Journal of General Virology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%