Back

Productivity drives demography and sex structure in a declining waterfowl species

Caizergues, A.; Lame, A.; Souchay, G.; Tableau, A.

2026-06-16 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.15.732236 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Demographic models are crucial for uncovering the mechanisms underlying changing populations trajectories and structure and to identify the drivers of such changes. Common pochard populations of North east/North west Europe have experienced a sharp decline accompanied by an increase in male proportions among adults since the mid-1990. We used a two-sex, two-stage deterministic matrix population model, to perform a prospective perturbation analysis and to explore, through simulations, some plausible causes underlying the observed decline and change in sex structure. We show that Common pochard populations are more sensitive to changing survival than to changes in productivitys components (clutch size, nest survival...). However, due to an environmental variance much higher than that of survival, components of productivity, especially nest survival, would be the main drivers of Common pochard populations growth rate, a finding supported by empirical data. More importantly, we show that although sex-specific changes in survival at any stage of the life cycle are potent drivers of both population growth rate and changing sex ratio, there is no need to resort to them for explaining the increasing proportions of males such as observed in Common pochard. Because adult males display higher survival than adult females (0.74 against 0.64 on average), any factor affecting recruitment (nest or first year survival) increases the weight of adults into the populations and hence the proportion of males. Thus, in species displaying sex-biased mortality, such as many ducks, decreasing recruitment can underly declining population size and changes in sex structure at the same time, emphasising the importance of accounting for males in monitoring schemes and demographic models.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.8%
2
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
4
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
6
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
7
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.6%
14
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
17
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
23
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%