Back

A hybrid framework integrating structural machine learning and 3D liver-on-chip assay for drug-induced liver injury prediction

Zhang, F.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, D.; Zhang, F.; Xiao, R.; Ai, X.

2026-06-18 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.15.732231 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a major cause of clinical attrition and postmarketing withdrawal, but structure only DILI predictors are difficult to compare because public benchmarks are vulnerable to compound overlap, scaffold similarity and shared label provenance. We present OakuloidTM, an open DILI prediction framework that pairs a leakage audited structure based model with an optional iBAC 3D primary human hepatocyte IC50/Cmax confirmation signal. The structural model integrates gradient boosted descriptor backbones, fingerprint random forests and LivTox proxy-DILI features through a logistic meta learner. Its evaluation is designed as part of the contribution: internal DILIrank, strict external TDC, scaffold disjoint TDC and independent Geci provenance checks are reported with released per compound predictions. Oakuloid reaches AUROC 0.811 on the strict external TDC benchmark and remains competitive under scaffold and fully clean TDC filtering. A channel attribution ablation shows that the external benchmark lead is driven by descriptor based gradient boosted trees rather than by DILIPredictor derived proxy features, reducing a potential circularity concern. The wet lab IC50/Cmax signal is largely orthogonal to structure and supports a confirmation mode that shifts the internal operating point toward higher specificity without claiming a universal AUROC gain. Oakuloid is released with code, model artifacts, calibration analysis, a 122 compound wet lab benchmark and a model card under the Apache License 2.0, supporting reproducible DILI screening and benchmark auditing.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.8%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.0%
3
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
5
Nature Protocols
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
7
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
12
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
14
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
17
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
19
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
22
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
26
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%