Back

A multi-modal flow phantom for quantitative PET/Spectral CT

Li, E. J.; Lammers, S.; Ge, Y.; McDonald, S.; Geagan, M.; Scheuermann, J.; Pantel, A. R.; Noel, P. B.; Karp, J. S.

2026-06-19 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.15.731705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeIn this work, we aimed to establish a flow phantom for multi-modal PET and spectral CT imaging to improve blood flow quantification. MethodsA modular flow phantom was built with materials compatible with both PET and spectral CT. A peristaltic pump was used to allow for recirculation. Pores were installed through the aorta to allow for tissue exchange between the blood and tissue compartments, and valves were placed in line with the aorta to control the pressure gradient between compartments. We characterized the system using saline bolus experiments, dynamic PET imaging, and iodine-based spectral CT acquisitions. A blood flow (K1) of 1.0 mL/min/mL with a pressure range of approximately 1.0-3.0 psi was targeted. Using compartmental modeling, we estimate K1 across phantom configurations and evaluate the consistency of perfusion-related parameters derived from saline, PET, and spectral CT measurements. ResultsWith the four pore, two valve configuration, target K1 of 1.0 mL/min/mL was achieved with a physiologic pressure range (2.2-3.5 psi) and a pump speed of 150 rpm. Further, the flow phantom was also able to recapitulate K1 across a range of values through adjustable modifications to the phantom configuration. ConclusionsWe present a modular multimodal flow phantom with a tissue-mimicking compartment, vascular tubing with an adjustable number of pores and valves, and 3D-printed components to support tunable exchange between blood-pool and tissue compartments and controlled dynamic perfusion imaging with same-session PET and spectral CT. Such a setup will enable the development of multi-modal approaches for evaluating tissue perfusion.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
4
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
9
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
11
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
16
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
23
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%