Brain age gap correlates with DTI-derived microstructural abnormalities in multiple sclerosis.
Lea, S.; Al-Ledani, O.; Bardell, C.; Maltby, V.; Ramadan, S.; Lea, R. A.; Lechner-Scott, J.
Show abstract
Background: Brain age gap (BAG) is increased in multiple sclerosis (MS), but whether it reflects microstructural pathology beyond conventional atrophy remains unclear. Objective: To test whether BAG is elevated in MS and correlates with conventional and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) abnormalities relative to healthy controls. Methods: A case-control study of 43 people with MS and 18 healthy controls was performed. BAG was estimated from T1-weighted MRI using brainageR. Controls were used as MRI reference distributions. MRI values were expressed as deviation z-scores and correlated with BAG within MS. Conventional MRI and DTI domains were analysed using age/sex-adjusted partial correlations with domain-wise Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction, where appropriate. Results: BAG was higher in MS than controls (4.79 vs -2.58 years; p<0.001; Cohen's d=0.84). Within MS, BAG correlated with EDSS (partial r=0.38, p=0.014), disease duration (r=0.39, p=0.011), and lesion volume (r=0.67, p<0.001). Control-referenced conventional MRI abnormalities correlated strongly with BAG, including lower peripheral grey matter volume (r=-0.71, q<0.001), higher CSF volume (r=0.69, q<0.001), and lower grey matter volume (r=-0.67, q<0.001). DTI associations were robust, including higher NAWM mean diffusivity (r=0.66, q<0.001), higher radial diffusivity (r=0.65, q<0.001), and lower fractional anisotropy (r=-0.52, q<0.001). Conclusions: BAG was elevated in MS and correlated with clinical severity, conventional MRI abnormality, and DTI-derived microstructural injury. These findings support BAG as a biologically relevant MS phenotype extending beyond volumetric atrophy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetisation transfer, diffusion and g-ratio measures of demyelination and neurodegeneration in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal microstructural MRI study 95%
- Brain disconnectome mapping and serum neurofilament light levels in multiple sclerosis 94%
- Imaging cortical multiple sclerosis lesions with ultra-high field MRI 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are associated with pathogenic CSF profiles and worse clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study 97%
- Glymphatic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis and its association with disease pathology and disability 97%
- Tissue damage detected by quantitative gradient echo MRI correlates with clinical progression in non-relapsing progressive MS 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spinal Cord Versus Brain Imaging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis Trajectory Combining 7T and 3T MRI 96%
- The sequence of regional structural disconnectivity due to multiple sclerosis lesions 95%
- Flexibility of brain dynamics is increased and predicts clinical impairment in Relapsing-Remitting but not in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The insidious degeneration of white matter and cognitive decline in Fabry disease 93%
- A prospective, observational study on conversion of Clinically Isolated Syndrome to Multiple Sclerosis during 4-year period (MS NEO study) in Taiwan 92%
- Brain connectivity changes underlying depression and fatigue in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current status and future opportunities in modeling Multiple Sclerosis clinical characteristics 96%
- Alpha-Linolenic Acid Associations with Disability and Brain Volume in Multiple Sclerosis: A Brief Replication Report 95%
- The Canadian Collaborative Project on Genetic Susceptibility to Multiple Sclerosis cohort population structure and disease etiology 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.