Back

Brain age gap correlates with DTI-derived microstructural abnormalities in multiple sclerosis.

Lea, S.; Al-Ledani, O.; Bardell, C.; Maltby, V.; Ramadan, S.; Lea, R. A.; Lechner-Scott, J.

2026-06-17 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.15.26355725 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Brain age gap (BAG) is increased in multiple sclerosis (MS), but whether it reflects microstructural pathology beyond conventional atrophy remains unclear. Objective: To test whether BAG is elevated in MS and correlates with conventional and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) abnormalities relative to healthy controls. Methods: A case-control study of 43 people with MS and 18 healthy controls was performed. BAG was estimated from T1-weighted MRI using brainageR. Controls were used as MRI reference distributions. MRI values were expressed as deviation z-scores and correlated with BAG within MS. Conventional MRI and DTI domains were analysed using age/sex-adjusted partial correlations with domain-wise Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction, where appropriate. Results: BAG was higher in MS than controls (4.79 vs -2.58 years; p<0.001; Cohen's d=0.84). Within MS, BAG correlated with EDSS (partial r=0.38, p=0.014), disease duration (r=0.39, p=0.011), and lesion volume (r=0.67, p<0.001). Control-referenced conventional MRI abnormalities correlated strongly with BAG, including lower peripheral grey matter volume (r=-0.71, q<0.001), higher CSF volume (r=0.69, q<0.001), and lower grey matter volume (r=-0.67, q<0.001). DTI associations were robust, including higher NAWM mean diffusivity (r=0.66, q<0.001), higher radial diffusivity (r=0.65, q<0.001), and lower fractional anisotropy (r=-0.52, q<0.001). Conclusions: BAG was elevated in MS and correlated with clinical severity, conventional MRI abnormality, and DTI-derived microstructural injury. These findings support BAG as a biologically relevant MS phenotype extending beyond volumetric atrophy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.