Back

Cross-Device Adaptation of Mirai for Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction

Sistig, A.; Rothstein, J. H.; Gadgil, T.; Achacoso, N.; Alexeeff, S. E.; Gerstley, L. D.; Klein, R. J.; Margolies, L. R.; Pu, A.; Smith Gueye, C. L.; Villasenor, M.; Westley, M.; Habel, L. A.; Arasu, V. A.; Sieh, W.; Shen, L.

2026-06-17 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.15.26355696 medRxiv
Show abstract

Fine-tuning can adapt pretrained medical imaging models to new clinical datasets, but device-specific domain shifts may limit generalizability. We evaluated Mirai, a mammography-based deep learning model for breast cancer risk prediction, in a large screening cohort containing Hologic and General Electric (GE) full-field digital mammography systems, including GE Premium View (GE PV) and Tissue Equalization (GE TE) post-processing software. Native Mirai showed lower performance on TE images than on Hologic or PV images. Fine-tuning on TE images improved TE performance, particularly for short-term risk prediction, but substantially reduced performance on Hologic images, consistent with catastrophic forgetting. To mitigate this effect, we developed a device-invariant model using interleaved multi-device sampling and conditional adversarial training. This approach largely restored Hologic performance while maintaining improved TE performance, providing better robustness across heterogeneous imaging platforms. Comparison of cumulative and annual risk AUCs over a five-year time horizon further showed that performance gains were driven mainly by short- and intermediate-term predictions. These findings highlight both the value and dangers of device-specific fine-tuning and support balanced domain-adaptation strategies for deploying mammography-based risk models across diverse clinical imaging environments.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.0%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.3%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.6%
5
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
8
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.8%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
14
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.1%
16
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
17
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
22
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%