Back

Fixation Matters: Multidimensional Effects Of Chemical Preparation On Morphology And Surface Texture Of Extremophilic Bacteria

Galván, F.;Albarracín, V.

2026-06-16 Cell Biology
10.64898/2026.06.14.732170 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is widely used to investigate bacterial surface architecture; however, sample preparation protocols may introduce structural artefacts that compromise the interpretation of morphometric and ultrastructural features. This issue becomes especially relevant for extremophilic microorganisms, whose specialized cell envelopes may respond differently to chemical fixation. In this study, we evaluated the effects of two aldehyde-based fixation protocols, 2.5% glutaraldehyde and Karnovskys solution, combined with different fixation times (1, 3, and 24 h) and the presence or absence of osmium tetroxide (OsO4) post-fixation, on three Gram-positive bacterial strains: the polyextremophiles Exiguobacterium sp. S17 and Nesterenkonia sp. Act20, and the mesophile Kocuria rosea CH-021. Morphological preservation was assessed using morphometric parameters, including cellular area and surface-to-volume ratio, together with texture analysis based on Haralick descriptors derived from grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM). Results showed that fixation conditions significantly affected morphometric and textural features in a strain-dependent manner. Although overall morphology appeared preserved, quantitative analyses revealed marked differences in surface texture and structural integrity among treatments. Osmium tetroxide modified morphometric and textural parameters, although its effects varied among strains and fixation conditions. These findings highlight the importance of integrated quantitative approaches combining cellular geometry and surface texture analysis for the evaluation of SEM preparation protocols in structurally specialized microorganisms.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.