Back

Mask-Based Breath Sampling for Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis and Bronchiectasis

Karimi, K.; Kumar, H. S.; Wege, S.; Tiseo, K.; Pfurtscheller, T.; Reipold, E. I.; Herth, F. J.; Klein, S.; Gupta-Wright, A.; Broger, T.; Denkinger, C. M.

2026-06-24 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.06.14.26355606 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Monitoring Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infection in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) is essential for early detection, targeted treatment, and prevention of chronification. Sputum culture is the current standard, yet many patients, particularly those receiving CFTR modulator therapy, struggle to expectorate sputum. Microbial aerosols from the respiratory tract offer a non-invasive alternative. This proof-of-principle study assessed the accuracy and feasibility of the AveloMask, a novel breath aerosol collection kit paired with qPCR detection. Methods: Adult pwCF and bronchiectasis patients attending routine monitoring visits and healthy controls were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Participants wore the mask for 30 minutes, followed by 20 instructed coughs. Mask filters were tested with a triplex qPCR assay targeting P. aeruginosa specific ecfX and gyrB, and human RPP30 as an endogenous control. Accuracy was evaluated using a composite reference standard (sputum culture and PCR). Results: Of 25 patients enrolled, 23 were included in the analyses. Sensitivity was 12/19 (63.2%) for breath qPCR versus 15/19 (78.9%) for sputum culture. Breath qPCR missed 5 cases detected by sputum culture but detected 2 sputum culture-negative/qPCR-positive cases. Specificity of breath qPCR was 100% in 4 patients and 15 healthy controls. RPP30 was detected in all mask samples. AveloMask was perceived as easy to use, with many patients preferring it over sputum collection. Discussion: Mask-based breath collection demonstrated promising diagnostic accuracy for detection of P. aeruginosa. Breath sampling may complement or partially substitute sputum-based diagnostics, especially in patients unable to expectorate. Further studies are needed to define its clinical role.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.1%
2
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
4
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
8
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
10
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
13
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
15
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
16
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
19
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
22
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%