Back

Optimised haemoglobin depletion improves clinical proteomics from dried blood spots

Ging, H.; Maher, R. E.; Davies, E.; Brownridge, P.; Rao, A.; Salama, A. D.; Oni, L.; Eyers, C.; Chetwynd, A. J.

2026-06-13 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.13.731967 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Equitable access to large sample cohorts for robust, high-throughput proteomics for biomarker discovery is a major barrier to widescale clinical implementation. Dried blood spots (DBS) offer a minimally invasive alternative to venous blood draws, enabling at-home microsampling (<50 {micro}L) for centralised analysis, thus enhancing research participation. This approach is particularly relevant for under-represented groups, including children, the elderly, minority backgrounds and those with long-term health conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), where disease fluctuations may occur outside the clinic, and vein preservation is critical. Proteomic analysis has demonstrated great utility in monitoring disease progression, and for biomarker/therapeutic target discovery. However, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of whole blood is hindered by the wide dynamic range and the relatively high abundance of proteins such as haemoglobin, compromising biomarker discovery. Here, we establish an optimised workflow for protein extraction and haemoglobin depletion from microsamples obtained using DBS, enabling sensitive and high-throughput proteomic analysis. We demonstrate that haemoglobin depletion increases protein identifications by [~]50%, mitigating ion suppression and dynamic range effects, enabling the identification of putative biomarkers from patients with stage 5 CKD on dialysis. We also evaluated a commercial cell-free DBS device which yielded a sample more representative of plasma compared to traditional DBS and enabled greater depletion of haemoglobin compared to traditional DBS with haemoglobin depletion methods. Our findings offer a scalable approach for biomarker discovery, facilitating remote, longitudinal clinical studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.9%
2
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.5%
3
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.0%
5
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.7%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
9
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Clinical Proteomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
14
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
16
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Molecular Omics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
19
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.5%
26
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
28
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
30
Journal of Neurochemistry
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%