Back

Cross-sectional study of the association between depressive symptoms and attentional bias to emotional stimuli in patients with acute stroke: Study protocol

Yamashita, M.; Takizawa, H.; Koizumi, K.; Hamaguchi, T.

2026-06-16 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.06.13.26355568 medRxiv
Show abstract

Post-stroke depression affects approximately 30% of patients after stroke and is associated with delayed recovery in activities of daily living, reduced rehabilitation effectiveness, and poorer quality of life. Attentional bias modification may provide a low-burden, nonpharmacological approach for patients in the acute phase of stroke. However, before such an intervention can be implemented in clinical practice, it is necessary to clarify whether attentional bias is present in patients with acute stroke and depressive symptoms, whether cognitive function influences the manifestation of this bias, and which task and stimulus formats are most appropriate for assessment. This multicenter, cross-sectional observational study will enroll patients with acute stroke between 7-30 days after stroke onset. Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Attentional bias will be measured under four task conditions based on the dot-probe task and the cue-target task, using face and word stimuli. Secondary assessments will include cognitive function, anxiety symptoms, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, and clinical background variables. The aims of this study are to investigate the association between depressive symptoms and attentional bias in patients with acute stroke, compare attentional bias characteristics across task and stimulus types, and examine the potential influence of cognitive function on this association. The findings are expected to provide an empirical basis for designing future attentional bias modification protocols targeting post-stroke depression in the acute phase. This study has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000059166).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
27.9%
2
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.8%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
5
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
6
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
7
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
12
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
13
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
29
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
30
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%