Back

Better data, better trees: GenBank-GISAID deduplication and source-specific artifact masking in viral genomics

de Moraes, L.; de Alencar, A. L.; Brusselmans, M.; Candido, D. d. S.; Faria, N. R.; Dellicour, S.; Lemey, P.; Khouri, R.

2026-06-16 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.12.731931 bioRxiv
Show abstract

GenBank and GISAID are the primary repositories for viral genomic data, but integrating records across them remains a challenge. The same sequence could be made available in both databases without any cross-reference linking the two entries. Consequently, there is no systematic way to identify this redundancy, which compromises the compilation of representative, non-redundant large-scale datasets. In parallel, the growth of viral genomic data has increased the risk of systematic technical artifacts introduced during sequencing or assembly. These artifacts can inflate substitution rate estimates and degrade temporal signal, biasing evolutionary rate estimates. To address both challenges, here we present a formal, reproducible workflow integrating two newly developed complementary tools: G2G matcher for cross-repository harmonization and Lab-Specific Bias FILTer (LSBFILT) for masking of laboratory-specific artifacts. Using the Eastern/Central/South African (ECSA) chikungunya virus lineage as a proof-of-concept, we demonstrate that our integrated workflow restores temporal signal and provides a robust, curated dataset for downstream phylodynamic analyses. Critically, restricting masking of homoplastic sites to specific sequences reduces the substitution rate estimate from an inflated 8.517 x 10-4 to 5.078 x 10-4 substitutions/site/year and increases the coefficient of determination (R2) of the root-to-tip regression analysis from 0.353 to 0.677. By enabling systematic cross-repository harmonization and source-specific artifact masking, we provide the molecular epidemiological community with scalable tools to reconcile fragmented genomic data and reduce technical biases, fostering more accurate and reproducible phylogenetic analysis. G2G matcher is available at https://github.com/andrezaleite/G2G-Matcher, and LSBFILT at https://github.com/khourious/LSBFILT.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.0%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
10
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
14
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
15
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
20
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%