Back

Identifying transcriptomic bias across developmental shifts in insects

Cornet, S.; Dennis, A. B.

2026-06-14 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.12.731678 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSynonymous mutations, once considered neutral, can affect translation efficiency through mRNA folding and splicing, generating codon usage bias. This bias is often linked to genomic GC content, which also influences gene regulation. In the parasitoid wasp Lysiphlebus fabarum, GC content was previously shown to shift between developmental stages, with larvae showing higher GC than adults. Whether this phenomenon is widespread among insects remains unknown. ResultsTranscriptomic data from six insect species spanning Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera was used to compare GC content between expressed genes in larvae and adults. In five species, larval transcripts exhibited higher GC content than adult transcripts. Differential expression analysis revealed that stage-biased genes displayed consistent GC shifts, and orthologous gene families with representatives across species showed particularly GC-rich larval-biased genes in Hymenoptera and Diptera. At the genome scale, modeling in 317 insect species demonstrated an association between parasitic lifestyle and reduced mean GC content in Hymenoptera and Diptera, providing a possible ecological explanation for AT-rich genomes. ConclusionsOur results show that GC content is dynamic across developmental stages, independent of overall genome composition. Stage-specific GC enrichment may reflect adaptive codon usage optimizing translation during energetically demanding life-history stages such as larval development. Furthermore, the association between parasitism and reduced genomic GC highlights how ecological lifestyle might with genome content and evolution. Lastly, this work identifies candidate genes underlying stage-specific GC bias and provides new insights into the interplay between molecular evolution, development, and parasitic adaptation in insects.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
2
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.8%
3
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
6
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
11
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
23
Insect Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
29
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%