Back

Poly-Social Risk for Hypertension Among Black and Latina Women

Belak, L.; James, K.; Auguste, L.; Rana, M.; Eweka, I.; De Moor, N.; Sarma, A.; Ensing, G.; Economy, K. E.; Powe, C. E.; Honigberg, M. C.

2026-06-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355558 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Hypertension is a leading modifiable cardiovascular risk factor prominently influenced by health-related social needs (HRSN). Whether detailed information on HRSN can improve identification of hypertension among minoritized women is unknown. Methods: Black and Latina women aged 18-65 years completed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Accountable Health Communities Screening Tool, assessing 13 HRSN domains. Hypertension was ascertained by a validated EHR-based algorithm or self-report of hypertension. Logistic regression tested associations of HRSN with hypertension. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation was used to derive a poly-social risk score in the training set (random 70%) and tested in the validation set (30%) against a sociodemographic model (age, race, income, education). Results: Among 1302 participants (mean [SD] age 40.1 [11.3] years, 70.4% Black, 44.3% Latina), higher cumulative burden of HRSN was associated with increased odds of hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for each additional domain of HRSN: 1.07 [95% CI 1.01-1.14], P=0.02). Food insecurity (aOR 2.30 [1.37-3.87], P= 0.002), lapse in utilities (aOR 1.44 [1.04-1.96], P=0.02), poor concentration (aOR 1.57 [1.13-2.17], P=0.007), and social isolation (aOR 1.77 [1.14-2.73], P=0.01) were associated with hypertension. In the validation set, the poly-social risk score did not improve discrimination for hypertension vs. the sociodemographic model (AUC 0.76 [95% CI 0.71-0.81] vs. AUC 0.80 [0.75-0.85]). Conclusion: In this cross-sectional analysis of Black and Latina women, greater cumulative social disadvantage was associated with hypertension. While inclusion of HRSN did not improve hypertension prediction beyond conventional sociodemographic indices, findings may inform targeted interventions among minorities at cardiometabolic risk.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.4%
2
Hypertension
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
4
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
5
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
8
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
10
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
11
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
21
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
BMC Nephrology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%