Back

Active commuting, anxiety symptoms and mental wellbeing: a dose-response study

Joensuu, L.; Jussila, J. J.; Lanki, T.; Tiittanen, P.; Pasanen, T. P.; Ekelund, U.; Halonen, J. I.

2026-06-15 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355515 medRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change draws attention to the planetary health perspective in sport and exercise sciences, that is, to physical activity that supports both human wellbeing and environmental sustainability. Active commuting is a sustainable form of physical activity with well-established somatic health benefits. However, more knowledge is needed on its relationship with mental health. We examined dose-response associations between active commuting, anxiety symptoms, and mental wellbeing among Finnish adults, and whether green commuting environment moderates these relationships. We used data from the cross-sectional Environment and Health Survey collected in June-September 2023 in the ten largest cities in Finland. Employed participants with data on anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7), mental wellbeing (World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index, WHO-5), commuting profile over a year (mode, frequency, distance, and perceived greenness along the commute route), and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were included (n=1,672; mean age 45.3 years; 53.8% women). Active commuting was defined as travelling the entire commute by walking or cycling (including e-biking) that was converted into approximated annual km/week and MET-h/week. We used linear and logistic regression with restricted cubic splines to evaluate dose-response associations, adjusted for key covariates. The role of perceived greenness was tested using an active commuting x commute greenness interaction term. We found no dose-response relationships between active commuting and anxiety symptoms or mental wellbeing in any of the models. No effect modification by commute greenness was observed. More research on how active commuting may support planetary health from a mental health perspective is needed.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
12
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
20
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.5%
27
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
28
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
29
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%