A Parent-Generated Framework of Early Connection: Findings from a CBPR Qualitative Study
Fuller, K.; Duby, S.; More, D.; Winter, M.; Lanoff, M.; Loveless, N.; Mejias, J.; Smalls, D.; Solomon, T.; Srinivasavaradan, D.; Thibert, S.; Vargas, C.; Shearman, N.; Dumitriu, D.; Lavallee, A.
Show abstract
Background: Early relational health (ERH) constructs are derived fromresearch observations rather than lived experiences. This study foregrounds diverse parent voices to examine how they describeconnectionwith their young children. Methods: Usingcommunity-based participatory research (CBPR),this study was co-designed withparent leadersfromReach Out and Read. A semi-structured interview guidewas co-designed,and parent leaderssubsequentlyconducted and transcribed 18 interviews with parents from their networks.Researchersanalyzed transcripts using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.Member checking sessions with parent leadersinformedthe analytic framework. Results:Sixorganizing principleswereidentified.(1) Parent-child connection begins with an instinctual sense of responsibility.(2)Connectionebbs and flows as parent and child adapt to one another through dailyactivities.(3) Family circumstances, including family structure, cultural expectations, and intergenerational values, directly shape this connection. (4) Parents' own upbringings and past relationships indirectly shape how they connect with their child. (5) Forconnectionto grow, parents must show up physically and emotionally for their children despite competing demands. (6) Parentsgrow through engaged parenting, and that growth feeds back into the connection, creating a self-sustaining cycle of relational health.Conclusions:Our analysis generated twoconstructs underspecified in ERH frameworks.Parents described their sense of responsibility as immediate and instinctual, preceding an emotional bond.Parentsdemonstratedtheir agency in deciding what to carry forward from their relational histories, a pattern this study termsrelational legacy. Integrating parent-generated language into ERH measurementresearchmay shape a more comprehensive picture of ERHreflectinghow families experience connection.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Caregiver-mediated interventions to support self-regulation among infants and young children (0-5): A protocol for a realist review 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 94%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “We felt like part of a production system”: a qualitative study on women’s experience of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland 94%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 94%
- Caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of the Smart Discharges Program for children with sepsis in Uganda: A descriptive qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental Perceptions of Early Childhood Research with In-Home Monitoring: A Qualitative Study 95%
- From Hospital to Home: Continuity between Skin-to-Skin Care and Later Verbal Engagement in Infants Born Preterm 93%
- Inpatient Kangaroo Care Predicts Early Cognitive Development at 6 and 12 Months in Infants Born Very Preterm 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 91%
- General population screening for type 1 diabetes using islet autoantibodies at the preschool vaccination visit: a proof-of-concept study (the T1Early study) 88%
- Longitudinal effect of gestational age on the developmental trajectory of social competence difficulties from early childhood to mid-adolescence: Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.