Development and validation of a risk prediction algorithm to estimate all-cause mortality among community-dwelling Canadians: the Mortality Population Risk Tool (MPoRT)
Manuel, D.; Bader Eddeen, A.; Fines, P.; Bennett, C.; Fisher, S.; Jessri, M.; Perez, R.; Tuna, M.; Sanmartin, C.; Sequeira, Y.; Li, J.; Rosella, L.; Hennessy, D.
Show abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk of all-cause mortality can inform decision-making for chronic disease prevention. We developed a predictive algorithm to estimate the 5-year risk of death among community-dwelling adults. METHODS: We derived and validated the Mortality Population Risk Tool (MPoRT) using data from population health surveys in Canada (the Canadian Community Health Survey) and the United States (the National Health Interview Survey), survey years 2001 to 2011, linked to vital statistics. The outcome was death within five years of the survey response. The algorithm was developed using data from Ontario respondents using a Cox proportional hazards model, then modified and re-estimated to allow cross-national assessment in Canada and the United States. Twenty-three prespecified predictors were assessed: seven sociodemographic, six behavioural, and ten general health and chronic disease. RESULTS: 527,369 respondents aged 20 to 105 years were included in the Canadian and United States development and validation cohorts, with 43,758 deaths during 3.68 million person-years follow-up. The final sex-specific MPoRT algorithms each contained 21 variables, showing strong discrimination (C-statistic: females 0.874 [0.871--0.877]; males 0.867 [0.865--0.871]) and good calibration overall and in 246 of 247 subgroups. Discrimination was modestly attenuated (0.01 decrease in C-statistic) in cross-national validation between Canada and the United States, with good calibration across all 71 subgroups. INTERPRETATION: MPoRT accurately discriminated all-cause mortality using only self-reported data, enabling broad application without clinical measures. While validation outside North America is needed to confirm broader applicability, MPoRT is designed for straightforward recalibration using routinely available national mortality data. This supports targeted chronic disease prevention strategies at both the population and individual levels, though the limitations inherent to self-reported predictors should be considered when interpreting predictions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing riskCommunicator: an R package to obtain interpretable effect estimates for public health 93%
- Latent class regression improves the predictive acuity and clinical utility of survival prognostication amongst chronic heart failure patients. 93%
- Patterns of rates of mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 93%
- A comparison of regression discontinuity and propensity score matching to estimate the causal effects of statins using electronic health records 92%
- Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 mortality: prospective cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 92%
- Estimating excess mortality in people with cancer and multimorbidity in the COVID-19 emergency 92%
- Interrupted time series analyses to assess the impact of alcohol control policy on socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in Lithuania: a study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 95%
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 94%
- Assessing the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on US Mortality: A County-Level Analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.