Back

Evaluation of AI-Generated Synthetic Data for Clinical Research in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention among Dyslipidemia Patients

Bonomi, A.; Werba, J. P.; Saccani, S.; Lu, L. L.; Coser, A.; Franchi, M.; Valsecchi, C.; Teruzzi, E.; Terragni, A.; Centenaro, C.; Scatigna, M.; Pompilio, G.

2026-06-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355456 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Access to high-quality clinical data is essential for advancing medical research and developing effective medical statistical and Artificial Intelligence models. However, privacy regulations and logistical barriers often hinder timely access to real-world data. Synthetic data offer a promising solution, preserving the statistical characteristics of original datasets while protecting patient privacy. Objectives: This study investigates the use of synthetic data for secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with dyslipidemia, using two real-world datasets from Centro Cardiologico Monzino. Methods: Given the high dimensionality and limited sample size of the datasets, we employed a custom generative framework based on Large Language Models (LLMs). Pre-trained LLMs were fine-tuned on original clinical records to synthesize tabular data replicating source-data distributions. Fine-tuning was performed within the Centro Cardiologico Monzino's secure infrastructure to ensure data sovereignty. We evaluate clinical utility and privacy using fidelity and privacy metrics, identifying the optimal generative model and benchmarking against traditional anonymization methods. Results: Synthetic data achieved a superior trade-off than classically anonymized datasets. Real and synthetic datasets showed strong agreement, with significant distributional differences limited to few variables. Models trained on synthetic data replicated key associations from the original dataset, including therapy modification and creatine phosphokinase as predictors of SAMS, and pharmacological intensity as the main driver of LDL-C reduction. Conclusions: Results support the feasibility of using synthetic data as a proxy for real-world datasets in exploratory analyses and model development. Despite slight attenuation of some effect sizes, preserved clinical relationships reinforce the validity of synthetic data in medical research.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
11.0%
3
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
5
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.2%
9
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
12
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
24
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
25
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%