Back

Multiple Fault Analysis and Drug Therapy on Signaling Pathways Using Dynamic Bayesian Network-based Model

Chowdhury, T.; Maitra, A.; Agarwal, A.; Sur, A.; Sarkar, S.; Majumder, S.; Lodh, E.

2026-06-15 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.11.731601 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer-associated signaling pathways often exhibit abnormal activation under simultaneous dysregulation of multiple molecular components. This study presents a probabilistic temporal Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN)-based framework for analyzing multi-fault behaviour and intervention response in Growth Factor (GF) and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Unlike deterministic Boolean propagation, the proposed model represents each pathway component through an activation probability and propagates these probabilities over discrete time steps using soft-logic update rules. One-, two-, three-, and four-fault scenarios were systematically evaluated under a common lowest-burden input vector. The resulting output probabilities were summarized using an encoded pathway-burden score, and known-drug combinations were ranked using efficiency scores relative to no-intervention baselines. Pareto analysis was further used to balance intervention efficiency against drug-vector burden, while a custom dual-target search was performed to identify computational intervention hypotheses beyond predefined drug targets. Results showed that encoded burden increased with fault order in both pathways, with MAPK producing a higher baseline burden than GF. Among known-drug vectors, U0126+LY294002+Temsirolimus consistently emerged as the strongest low-burden candidate, achieving efficiency close to the maximum six-drug vector. Custom dual-target analysis identified ERK1/2+RPS6KB1 in GF and Raf+MEK1 in MAPK as high-impact computational target pairs. Runtime benchmarking showed that batched vectorized NumPy execution substantially improved scalability for higher-order fault simulations. Overall, the framework provides an interpretable and scalable approach for probabilistic pathway-level fault analysis and intervention prioritization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.3%
2
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.2%
3
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
8
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
9
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
12
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
15
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%