Back

LLM-Driven Extraction of NI-RADS and Imaging Tumor Characteristics to Enhance Oropharyngeal Cancer Survivorship Surveillance

Song, W.; Shbita, L.; Jang, I. J. H.; Starostina, O.; Lewis, R.; Sahli, A.; Floyd, W. R.; Mahin, M.; Rinsurongkawong, W.; Barbon, C. E. A.; Lai, S. Y.; Lee, J. J.; Shah, K.; Chen, M. M.; Hutcheson, K. A.; Fuller, C. D.; Moreno, A. C.

2026-06-17 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.11.26355483 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Purpose Radiologic surveillance is essential for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors, guiding recurrence detection and follow-up strategies. The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System provides a standardized framework for post-treatment risk reporting at both the primary tumor site (pNI-RADs) and cervical lymph nodes (nNI-RADS). Comprehensive surveillance additionally requires assessment of disease status, including the primary tumor, nodal involvement, and distant metastases. These clinical results are often embedded as unstructured data within free-text radiology reports. We hypothesized that a large language model (LLM) can reliably extract NI-RADS score criteria and summarize key imaging features from unstructured radiology text, achieving high concordance with expert review. Methods Previously untreated OPC patients who received definitive cancer therapy were identified. Eligible imaging reports included post-treatment head and neck CT, MRI, or FDG PET/CT scans containing narrative and impression text. Examinations lacking narrative or impression text, containing pre-existing NI-RADS annotations, or involving non-surveillance imaging modalities were excluded. A total of 200 reports were randomly selected from 7,076 eligible examinations for manual abstraction using a three-reviewer consensus framework to establish a reference dataset. Using the Palantir Foundry Pipeline Builder, a GPT-5-based LLM was deployed to extract pNI-RADS and nNI-RADS scores, and key imaging features of disease status from these reports. Performance was evaluated using exact agreement and F1-based metrics. Results Agreement for no evidence of disease (score of 1) was 93.3% (126/135; F1 = 0.94) and 90.3% (130/144; F1 = 0.93) for pNI-RADS and nNI-RADS, respectively. For NI-RADS [≥]2, exact category agreement was 73.1% (38/52; macro-F1 = 0.75) for pNI-RADS and 64.3% (27/42; macro-F1 = 0.56) for nNI-RADS. Quadratic weighted {kappa} was 0.81 and 0.59, respectively. For post-treatment disease surveillance variables, agreement was 94.9% (149/157; F1 = 0.87) for primary tumor presence, 89.1% (164/184; F1 = 0.87) for nodal disease presence, and 94.7% (126/133; F1 = 0.70) for distant metastasis detection. Specificity was high across disease-status variables (0.95-0.99), with negative predictive values of 0.95 for primary tumor, 0.87 for nodal disease, and 0.99 for distant metastasis. Conclusions Our LLM-based information retrieval and classification approach for radiographic treatment response from unstructured, multidimensional imaging reports achieved high performance for disease exclusion and moderate performance for detecting suspected residual and/or new disease. This pipeline supports scalable and standardized surveillance data capture for longitudinal monitoring, clinical analytics, and survivorship research in head and neck oncology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.3%
3
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
6
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
7
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
9
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
17
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
25
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
29
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%