Back

Semantic Embeddings and the Peripheral Transcriptome in Ischemic Stroke: Connecting Molecular Signatures to NANDA-I Diagnoses

Santos, R. d. P.; Tinoco Patricio, A. d. O.; Gama, P. H.; Freitas, L. M. D.; Ribeiro, K. R.

2026-06-15 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.11.26355453 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To construct and evaluate, in an exploratory manner, a pathophysiologic rationale link- ing biological pathways derived from the peripheral transcriptome in ischemic stroke (IS) to nursing diagnoses in the NANDA-I 2024-2026 taxonomy, while emphasizing that this association is not di- rect, deterministic, or automatically inferable from textual similarity with large language models (LLMs). Methods: A computational study was conducted using public secondary data from the Gene Ex- pression Omnibus series GSE16561, which includes 63 peripheral blood samples: 39 from indi- viduals with IS and 24 from healthy controls. The pipeline integrated transcriptomic analysis and functional enrichment, semantic mapping through ClinicalBERT embeddings, and mechanistic and clinical-conceptual judgment using Claude Sonnet 4.6 as a judge. The judgment stage was treated as the central interpretive layer, designed to mediate the transcriptome, pathophysiology, functional manifestation, and NANDA-I diagnosis. Results: The analysis identified a bimodal transcriptomic pattern, with activation of pathways re- lated to innate immunity and suppression of pathways related to adaptive immunity. Semantic map- ping generated 158 pathway-diagnosis pairs. The Spearman correlation between cosine similarity and the mechanistic score was negative and statistically significant (rho = -0.243; p = 2.09e-03), but weak in magnitude. This effect size indicates that semantic similarity explained less than 6% of the variance in mechanistic plausibility, reinforcing the insufficiency of embeddings as a stand- alone criterion. Of the 158 pairs, 14 were classified as high concordance, 8 as moderate, and 136 as divergent. Conclusion: The main value of this study lies in demonstrating that translating biological pathways into nursing diagnoses requires pathophysiologic, functional, and clinical-conceptual mediation. The prioritized pairs represent mechanistically plausible hypotheses for future research, without implying causality, direct clinical confirmation, or immediate care recommendations.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.4%
3
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
19
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
27
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
28
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%