Back

A Drug-Specific, Half-Life-Adjusted Framework for Classifying CNS-Active Systemic Therapy Exposure During and After Radiotherapy

Pari Mitre, L.; Drapkin, B.; Dohopolski, M.

2026-06-22 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.11.26354463 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clinical oncology datasets often store systemic therapy as a regimen label with a start date and an end date. Those records are clinically recognizable but can be analytically incomplete when the research question concerns whether a patient was exposed to a concurrent CNS-active drug (cCNS-aD) or an adjuvant CNS-active drug (aCNS-aD) around radiotherapy. Contemporary CNS-oncology studies usually define CNS activity by empiric drug lists and define concurrency by fixed calendar windows, although the literature shows substantial heterogeneity across both concepts. This paper proposes a generalizable framework for converting raw systemic therapy records into reproducible cCNS-aD and aCNS-aD variables, useful in subgrouping for clinical studies. The framework uses a transparent CNS scoring model based on three clinical evidence components: intracranial objective response rate, consensus CNS endorsement, and intrathecal route of administration. It then defines a pharmacokinetic exposure proxy as the recorded end date plus five half-lives. Concurrent exposure is classified by overlap with the radiotherapy interval, while post-radiotherapy exposure is classified by overlap with a prespecified post-RT attribution window. The framework separately identifies post-RT pharmacokinetic persistence and post-RT treatment initiation, allowing investigators to distinguish continued exposure from true adjuvant initiation. This is a methodological framework and reference implementation. Implementation audits and endpoint-specific sensitivity analyses remain necessary before use as a definitive exposure classifier

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.5%
3
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
7
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
11
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%