Back

Generative Drug Design in a Loop with dtSFM

Reddy, S. T.

2026-07-08 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.06.10.731501 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Directed evolution consisting of iterative rounds of diversification, selection, and counter-selection, underlies modern protein and antibody engineering, yet small-molecule drug design still advances largely through high-throughput screening and medicinal-chemistry intuition. Transformer softmax attention is mathematically identical to the Boltzmann distribution that governs molecular binding at thermal equilibrium1, an isomorphism that prescribes a sequence-native Specificity Foundation Model (SFM)2. This framework was recently applied across seven molecular recognition domains3,4 and scaled into the drug-target SFM (dtSFM), the first to pair a full-scale encoder with a generative decoder5. Whether such a model can be driven, iteratively and under selection, to optimize leads rather than sample them once has not been shown. Here we present GenLoop, a closed generative drug design loop that turns single-pass generation into directed evolution of chemistry. dtSFM generates target-conditioned molecules and reranks them by their thermodynamic compatibility score. An orthogonal structural verifier, AlphaFold 3, is used that shares no architecture or training data with dtSFM. Cheminformatics filters enforce developability, and generative evolution is performed on the structurally verified candidates, selecting for predicted binders and counter-selecting against off-target chemistry. Applied across twelve drug targets spanning pharmacologically distinct mechanism classes, GenLoop produced AlphaFold 3-verified designs that reached the structural confidence of the approved drug for five of the twelve targets, with the best designs at interface iPTM 0.93-0.98 and PAE 0.8-2.0 [A], as well as resolving paralog selectivity across nine targets. Two full disease campaigns followed. For the cystic-fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, GenLoop designed nine developability-filtered and structurally novel lead candidates (iPTM up to 0.93, interface PAE 2.3 [A]) targeting all three orthogonal sites of the approved drug Trikafta. For the GLP-1 receptor family, dtSFM engineered tunable single-, dual-, and triple-receptor incretin designs, yielding 23 central-pocket candidates that are structurally novel at median iPTM 0.89 and interface PAE 1.95 [A]. GenLoop with dtSFM brings directed evolution to small molecules through computational-thermodynamic selection; wet-lab validation is the immediate next step.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.9%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.6%
4
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
5
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
8
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
9
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
11
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.7%
16
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
19
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%
23
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
26
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%