Back

Leveraging genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction for distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) testing in maize

Daware, A. v.; Hacke, C.; Remay, A.; Starnberger, P.; Schraml, C.; Collonnier, C.; Laurens, F.; Schmid, K. J.

2026-06-12 genetics
10.64898/2026.06.10.731330 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Testing for distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) is a requirement for plant variety registration and based on phenotypic traits, which is time-consuming and sensitive to environmental variation. Advances in genomics allow to complement DUS testing with molecular markers, for which two models in DUS testing were proposed by the Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). A use cases was described for maize, but an implementation has been hindered by a lack of suitable markers and validated analytical frameworks. We address these challenges by integrating historical DUS characteristics scores from 352 European hybrid maize varieties with high-density genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Using genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we identified 18 genomic regions and candidate genes associated with 12 DUS characteristics, enabling the development of diagnostic markers consistent with the UPOV model "Characteristic-Specific Molecular Markers". Since most DUS traits are polygenic, we combined GWAS-informed marker selection with XG-Boost-based machine learning to predict notes of DUS characteristics. This approach achieved strong predictive performance across multiple traits (mean accuracy 0.67), demonstrating its potential for managing reference collections under UPOV model "Combining phenotypic and molecular distances in the management of variety collections". Both approaches were validated for two characteristics using independent public USDA-NPGS maize datasets (>1,700 accessions) highlighting the value of public data for method validation. We also identify key limitations of historical DUS data, including imbalanced and sparse trait representation, and discuss mitigation strategies. Despite these constraints, our results demonstrate that molecular markers may improve maize DUS testing, enabling faster, more accurate variety registration and supporting accelerated crop improvement. Key messageHistorical DUS datasets can be used to identify marker-trait associations of DUS characteristics using genome-wide association study (GWAS) and to develop a genomic prediction framework for an accurate prediction of DUS character notes from marker data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
6
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
25
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%