Back

Microfluidic Core-Shell Encapsulation Enables Scalable Generation of Apical-Out Intestinal Spheroids

Ota, S.; SHUKLA, P.; Otaki, N.; Taylor, E. J.; Hattori, K.

2026-06-10 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.10.731294 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Apical-out intestinal spheroids provide direct access to the lumen-facing epithelial surface, making them attractive three-dimensional models for studying epithelial barrier function, nutrient uptake, and luminal exposure. However, existing polarity-reversal methods typically require releasing spheroids from surrounding ECM gels and culturing them in suspension, which can compromise matrix-derived cues, promote fusion, increase size heterogeneity, and limit scalability. Here, we develop a microfluidic core-shell encapsulation strategy to scalably produce apical-out intestinal spheroids within uniform hydrogel microcapsules. These microcapsules consist of a Matrigel core surrounded by an agarose shell. Flow-focusing microfluidics first confines Caco-2 cells in Matrigel cores that provide instructive extracellular matrix cues, and particle-templated emulsification subsequently encloses each core within an inert agarose shell that prevents spheroid fusion and preserves batch uniformity. The method generated >100,000 microcapsules per experiment, with a mean shell diameter of 117 {micro}m, a coefficient of variation below 9%, and >90% single-spheroid formation efficiency. The resulting spheroids established apical-basolateral polarity, organised tight junctions, formed a dextran-excluding epithelial barrier, and exhibited fatty-acid uptake. This core-shell strategy provides an experimentally tractable platform for scalable intestinal epithelial modelling and may be extensible to other epithelial microtissue systems. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=42 SRC="FIGDIR/small/731294v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16dc3forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d5d947org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1abe79forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f39239_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
6
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
7
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
8
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
11
APL Bioengineering
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
14
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
17
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
22
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%