Back

Nutrient currencies and P resorption greatly amplify the perceived costs of reproductive allocation in perennial heath shrubs

Wenk, E.; Falster, D. S.; Wright, I. J.; Westoby, M.

2026-06-12 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.10.731282 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SummaryO_LIIn woody perennials, reproductive allocation considered as a fraction of NPP (RA) has been rarely quantified, especially tracked across plant lifetimes, measured in biologically meaningful currencies, and separated from standing biomass. C_LIO_LIWe addressed this gap by measuring dry mass, nitrogen, and phosphorus for every aboveground tissue type for 14 iteroparous perennial shrubs tracked across their full lifetimes, calculating RA using four accounting schemes and three currencies. C_LIO_LIRA was substantially higher by mid-life than typical estimates from ecosystem-scale studies. Distinguishing standing biomass from yearly production further revised RA upwards. Using a nutrient currency (especially P) increased the perceived costs of reproduction. Propagules were highly nutrient-enriched and reproductive accessory costs consumed more nutrients than did the propagules themselves. Considering N and P resorption from senescing leaves and wood shrank the effective vegetative nutrient budget, further concentrating net annual nutrient demand in reproductive tissues. C_LIO_LIOur results highlight high investment in RA for woody perennials, especially using nutrient currencies. Broadly similar allocation patterns were observed across species with different functional traits and lifespans, suggesting generality that may apply across biomes. Widespread underestimation of RA in forest growth models likely overestimates the proportion of NPP available for vegetative growth, leading to substantial errors in predictions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.4%
3
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
6
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
11
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
13
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
14
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
17
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
19
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%