Back

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus transmission: exploring perceptions of human-animal-tick interactions across six districts in Uganda

Kugler, M.; Mujumbusi, L.; Pickering, L.; Muhumuza, R.; Akugizibwe, M.; Obicho, E.; Apangu, T.; Umo, E.; Nuwamanya, S.; Ashraf, S.; Atim, S. A.; Thomson, E. C.; Lamberton, P. H. L.

2026-06-12 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355422 medRxiv
Show abstract

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) causes a viral zoonotic disease transmitted through tick bites and direct contact with infected blood or tissue of infected animals. Socio-ecological and behavioural risk factors for CCHFV exposure in Uganda remain poorly understood, which can lead to the omission of key risk factors in quantitative survey design and limit our wider understanding. In this study, we explored human-animal-tick interaction transmission risks in Uganda. We conducted 24 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 31 key-informant interviews (KIIs) across six environmentally and socio-ecologically diverse districts, between October 2023 and March 2024. Study sites were selected using K-prototype analysis, which combined environmental and socio-ecological variables to identify distinct clusters within Uganda. FGDs were conducted separately with groups of community leaders, men, women and teenagers with stratified purposive sampling. Medical doctors, veterinarians, traditional healers, district surveillance officers, and herdsmen were individually interviewed as key informants and purposively sampled. Data were transcribed and translated into English, and analysed thematically using iterative categorisation in NVivo 14. Most participants reported tick bites, some as frequently as every day. Close contact with animals was common, including sleeping next to them in the same building, largely due to concerns about animal theft. Less frequent but notable practices included slaughtering animals for consumption or sacrifice and interactions with wild animals during hunting. Slaughtering and butchering an animal which was sick or had died was reportedly performed by participants in most districts. Plucking and roasting engorged ticks was a practice described in the Kaabong and Arua districts of Northern Uganda. These practices and behaviours highlight potential key risks of CCHFV transmission and underscore the need for future studies to address specific behaviours, to quantify if, and to what extent, they present an exposure risk. Further work should include underlying reasons for the behaviours, which would help ensure that culturally appropriate interventions are targeted.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.0%
2
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
12.1%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
7
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
18
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
22
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%