Back

Room-Specialized Mixture-of-Experts for In-Home ADL Recognition with Ambient Sensors

Addepalli, V. r.; Rao, P.; Kiselica, A.; Kummerfeld, E.; Abdalnabi, N.; Lee, K.

2026-06-12 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355390 medRxiv
Show abstract

Monitoring activities of daily living (ADLs) in the home is a promising approach for tracking dementia progression in older adults. While ambient sensor-based ADL systems are well-studied, most existing ADL recognition systems rely on globally trained models that ignore the spatial organization of in-home activities. In real deployments, where training data are sparse and highly home-specific, global transformer models may fail to capture room-dependent behavioral structure. We propose a deterministic Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture for in-home ADL recognition, in which each expert is a compact transformer specialized to one room of the home (bedroom, kitchen, bathroom, living area). Input segments are routed using a deterministic gating strategy based on room-level motion activity and time-of-day priors for sleep-related behaviors. Unlike learned routing networks, the proposed gate encodes domain knowledge about where ADLs are likely to occur, reducing model complexity under limited per-home training data. By decomposing ADL recognition into room-specific activity spaces, the proposed architecture reduces competition between dominant and low-frequency activities under highly imbalanced residential data. We evaluated the system on data collected via low-cost ambient sensors (motion, light, temperature, humidity) and Raspberry Pi edge devices across five homes, with ground-truth ADL labels provided by participants and caregivers. Across the five homes, the proposed MoE consistently outperformed global transformer, 1D CNN, and Random Forest baselines, achieving macro-F1 scores ranging from 0.60 to 0.88, highlighting the importance of home-specific modeling in real-world deployments. These findings suggest that room-aware expert specialization may provide a practical and interpretable strategy for low-data ADL recognition in real-world residential environments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
3
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
5
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
6
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
17
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
24
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%