Back

AlphaGenome identifies a deep intronic variant in a family with PLA2G6-associated neurodegeneration: Closing the diagnostic gap in rare genetic diseases

Eger, S. J.; Lopez, G.; Gomez Navarro, L. F.; Pena-Tauber, A.; Cochran, J. N.; Hiatt, S. M.; Gelvez, N.; Garcia-Garcia, M.; Lobo, S.; Greicius, M. D.; Matallana, D. L.; Acosta-Uribe, J.; Kosik, K. S.

2026-06-18 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355004 medRxiv
Show abstract

A molecular diagnosis remains out of reach for a substantial subset of patients with clinically recognizable Mendelian disorders, even after comprehensive next-generation sequencing. Causal variants in non-coding regions are difficult to detect and interpret using standard pipelines. Deep intronic variants that disrupt splicing are a known but underexplored source of pathogenic alleles, and systematic tools to evaluate them at scale have only recently emerged. We aimed to resolve an incomplete genetic diagnosis in two siblings with early-onset parkinsonism, prominent neuropsychiatric features, and autonomic dysfunction consistent with PLA2G6-associated neurodegeneration (PLAN), an autosomal recessive condition. Prior clinical exome sequencing, genome sequencing, Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), and long-read sequencing had identified only a single heterozygous PLA2G6 missense variant, c.2132C>G (p.Pro711Arg). We used AlphaGenome to score 91 non-coding variants shared among the affected siblings and their father within 1 megabase of the PLA2G6 locus. The deep-learning model identified an intronic variant (c.2034+355G>A) that was predicted to create a cryptic splice acceptor site that could result in inclusion of a 160-bp cryptic exon. Tissue-specific predictions indicated the aberrant splicing would be detectable in blood, confirmed by junction-spanning RNA-seq reads from an unrelated carrier. This analysis completed a compound heterozygous PLAN diagnosis nearly two decades after symptom onset and demonstrates the utility of sequence-to-function models. Systematic integration of tools like AlphaGenome into rare disease workflows offers a practical, low-barrier route to closing the diagnostic gap for patients with compelling Mendelian phenotypes and incomplete genetic diagnoses.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.7%
2
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.6%
5
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
6
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
7
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
8
Movement Disorders
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
10
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
11
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
Neurology Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Molecular Neurodegeneration
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Human Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
22
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
25
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
28
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
29
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%