Back

Timecourse of corticospinal excitability for observed action: evidence of early suppression followed by return to baseline without facilitation

Baptiste, W. M.; Moreno-Verdu, M.; Van Caenegem, E. E.; Boidequin, L. F.; Truong, C.; Hamel, R.; Hardwick, R. M.

2026-06-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.09.731129 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAction observation modulates corticospinal excitability, with most previous studies indicating an increase in excitability in the muscles involved in the observed movement. In addition, previous work suggests that modulation of corticospinal excitability could be specific to the timing of the stimulation, muscle, and direction of movement. Here we examined the influence of these factors on corticospinal excitability. MethodParticipants observed stimuli presenting a static hand, followed by an image of the endpoint of an index/little finger abduction movement. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered at time points from 100-800ms after movement onset. Stimuli were presented in various orientations to study possible effects of anatomical positioning and movement direction, compared relative to the control condition of a static hand. ResultsCorticospinal excitability was lower at early timings (100-400ms), before rising to a plateau at later timings (500-800ms) which did not differ from the static hand condition. This facilitation was muscle-specific, with higher excitability for the muscle involved in the observed movement. By contrast, the relative direction of movement did not influence corticospinal excitability. DiscussionThese results replicate the time-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability induced by action observation; however, we argue that simply interpreting such effects as an increase in excitability may be overly simplistic. In line with previous studies, we argue that the choice of control condition used during action observation studies may be critical to the overall direction of effects.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.0%
2
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
4
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
8
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
10
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
15
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%