Back

In-vitro evaluation of Ozenoxacin and other Antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Tripathi, S.; Singhal, S.; Berlia, R.; Yadav, M. K.; TARAI, B.; Priyadarshini, A.; Choudhary, R.; Samuel Raj, P. S.; Vethakkani, S. R.

2026-06-10 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.09.731036 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes are major causative bacteria responsible for skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) such as impetigo. Increasing resistance to commonly used topical antibiotics necessitates evaluation of newer agents for the treatment of skin infections. Ozenoxacin, a novel non-fluorinated topical quinolone, has shown promise, exhibiting potent activity against a wide range of pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRSA) and Streptococcus pyogenes. The present study compared the in vitro activity of ozenoxacin and comparator agents against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes from multiple sources including skin and soft-tissue, wound, abscess, and blood. Ozenoxacin was assessed for in vitro antimicrobial activity against 109 methicillin-susceptible (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and 24 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates by broth microdilution method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Ozenoxacin demonstrated potent in-vitro activity against all 109 S. aureus (MIC50/90= 0.125/0.5 {micro}g/ml) and 24 S. pyogenes (MIC50/90= 0.015/0.03 {micro}g/ml) strains. In contrast, higher MICs were observed for fusidic acid and mupirocin among a subset of S. aureus isolates. A comparison of MIC90values demonstrated that ozenoxacin (0.5 {micro}g/ml) was more active against S. aureus isolates than 8 of the 9 comparator agents tested including vancomycin and linezolid (MIC90= 2 & 4 {micro}g/ml) respectively. In vitro studies of ozenoxacin showed potency against staphylococci and streptococci including resistant S. aureus strains. These findings support its role as an effective first-in-class quinolone topical therapeutic option in the management of various SSTIs.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.4%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
7
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
8
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
npj Antimicrobials and Resistance
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
25
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%