Back

Mechanistically informed adaptive dosing for cancer immunotherapy using AI-guided decision making

Garg, A.; Das, S. S.; Sivadasan, N.; Roy, A.; Chakrabarty, B.

2026-07-08 systems biology
10.64898/2026.06.09.730783 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optimizing dose and schedule remains a central challenge in oncology drug development, particularly for immunotherapies where fixed dosing regimens often fail to account for patient specific heterogeneity in tumor-immune dynamics. Here, we present a hybrid quantitative systems pharmacology-reinforcement learning-Monte Carlo Tree Search (QSP-RL-MCTS) framework for personalized immunotherapy dosing that formulates dose selection as a sequential decision-making problem. The approach integrates a mechanistic QSP model of prostate cancer immunotherapy, transcriptomics informed virtual patient populations and data driven AI system comprising reinforcement learning and Monte Carlo tree search. Reinforcement learning is used to learn adaptive generalized dosing policies that optimize treatment outcomes across the population, while Monte Carlo Tree Search provides forward-looking evaluation of RL predicted dosing trajectories to refine patient-specific decisions. On benchmarking against fixed dosing regimens of ipilimumab, the remission rate of the proposed model (95.2%) was comparable to the highest fixed dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg per dose while the median total dose (72 mg/kg) of the proposed model designed regimen was comparable to the lowest fixed dosing regimen of 3 mg/kg per dose. The model is generalizable across different dosing protocols and can be extended to predict optimal dose under different therapeutic scenarios. Analysis of the learned dosing trajectories enables stratification of patients into distinct response groups and identifies drug activity rate as the dominant determinant of long-term treatment outcome. These results demonstrate how mechanistically guided artificial intelligence can transform population-level dose optimization into patient-specific, biologically interpretable treatment strategies for precision immuno-oncology.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.6%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
11
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
14
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
20
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%